CalvilloHousley893

From LVSKB
Revision as of 11:03, 26 June 2012 by CalvilloHousley893 (Talk | contribs) (New page: Engineering Modeling - An Iterative Approach Making the structure of a model be the just like the dwelling from the engineering component modeled turns 2 problems into one. This speeds up...)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

Engineering Modeling - An Iterative Approach

Making the structure of a model be the just like the dwelling from the engineering component modeled turns 2 problems into one. This speeds up co-operation in prototyping of both software model and also the component. Both rapid prototyping and rapid application design/development involve iterative fast development with prototypes communicated. Requirements emerge gradually included in this process, so early stage design can begin, in co-operation with life-cycle management, marketing accounts etc. To get full take advantage of all of this staff who are part of this design process, manufacturing, management, and life-cycle management have to be able to access the models. The longer term aim would be to enable direct modeling/prototyping of the by customers from the modeling tool e.g. engineers/end-user programmers. This type of system documents itself as the structure from the engineering product and software model are displayed/visualized.

Integration of knowledge representation UML/DOORS is progress towards this. Also a interface is needed that makes it easier for engineers to model using this type of combined UML/Doors solution

model engineering

Despite object-oriented programming techniques being heavily influenced by the approach used by engineers for Bill of Materials/Product Data Structure modeling this link has become difficult. A lot of object-oriented programming was developed before graphical user interfaces became practical and customary. So objects/classes are often represented mainly by text with visualization/representation being added as an afterthought. This is not useful for engineers who are accustomed to objects being physical things, or at best diagrams. A further problem has been an over-emphasis on encapsulation (hiding an objects' details, while creating an interface because of its use), and re-use. This may lead to errors because of re-use of objects that aren't fully understood. Therefore the classes/objects need to be visualized, even if the user does not intend to change their contents, so the user of objects has sufficient understanding of how to use them.

The above mentioned steps would improve the link and co-operation between engineers and modelers/models.